Class schema according to Oesch
Class schema according to Oesch
The class schema developed by Oesch (2006) represents an expansion on traditional class models, such as the EGP, which have been criticised for their strong emphasis on industrial societies and their lack of consideration for changes in social structure. The objective of constructing the class schema according to Oesch (2006) was to more adequately reflect both vertical and horizontal inequalities, thereby ensuring that disparities within the middle class become more apparent and possible political lines of conflict in association with class affiliations can be delineated. The class schema according to Oesch (2006) is constructed in two dimensions, incorporating both vertical class differences, such as autonomy through leadership responsibility and control over means of production through self-employment versus dependent employment, and horizontal differences in work logic, including occupations.
Related classifications:
International Standard Classification of Occupations 2008 (ISCO-08)
Keywords
socio-economic classification, market situation, labour situation, class situation
Class schema according to Oesch
Fundamental literature: Oesch, Daniel (2006): Redrawing the class map. Stratification and institutions in Britain, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Oesch, Daniel (2013): Occupational change in Europe. How technology and education transform the job structure. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
more
Further literature: Ares, Macarena (2022): Issue politicization and social class: How the electoral supply activates class divides in political preferences. European Journal of Political Research 61:503–523.
Oesch, Daniel, und Jorges Rodriguez Menes (2011) Upgrading or polarization? Occupational change in Britain, Germany, Spain and Switzerland, 1990-2008. Socio-Economic Review 9:503–531.
Oesch, Daniel, und Line Rennwald (2018): Electoral competition in Europe's new tripolar political space: Class voting for the left, centre‐right and radical right. European Journal of Political Research 57:783–807.